I was watching a morning show in my area called Dr. Oz (November 9, 2009) and he shared a research graph that showed “happiness” being scientifically researched and divided into three parts:
50% was Genetics (includes childhood/adulthood experiences and body/brain chemistry)
10% was Geographic Location/Situation
40% was Intention
When the expert was asked about job satisfaction and economic circumstances, she said that as long as the overall needs were met (food, shelter, clothing) then more money, bigger homes, more expensive clothes didn’t increase happiness significantly.
I’m happier because of where I live (geography) and where I live are supposed to be where happier people live so what comes first? Ok, I’ll just say I get the full 10% credit on that one. I moved with very specific intentions to be happy personally and professionally. So I’ll slide into that 40%, making me 50% happy. My childhood experiences were living in poverty, with an alcoholic/drug and sexual abuser, but somehow I could find a silver lining to maintain my sanity (not feeling completely safe, keeping a cautious but relatively happy brain/body chemistry). Making it to adulthood, I have sound food, shelter, and clothing, I feel safe, loved, and grateful. So if we work on a 10 point scale, does that give me a passing grade for happiness?
Would a scientific quotient for happiness help you? For the more measurable, it’s worth a look (google Dr. Oz). Consider this formula as well. Know yourself and what your hot buttons are with finances, intellectual stimulation, physical activity, social interaction, spiritual activity. Who helps you effectively push those buttons (keep them close)? Among other things, I use Astrology, Numerology and Birth Order as a tool to get to know yourself and others. It’s very easy to understand. Here is a page that gives you top-line info on how to do this at http://www.michellepayton.com/BMP-calculations.htm . Yes, we have some blocks. I’ve got some answers there too, but that’s another blog.
Speak to you soon.
